Justin was hired in February of 2004 as
a salesperson. There is no written employment contract, and Justin is
paid on a commission basis. Justin’s manager has said to Justin on
several occasions that if Justin continues to meet his sales quotas,
that the company “will keep him around for a long time.” Justin has
always met his sales quotas, but is told one day that they have decided
to replace him because he does not project the image that the company
wants. If Justin is an at-will employee, which of the following is true?
A. The employer would not be able to fire Justin on the basis of public policy.
B. The statements by the manager could likely give Justin contract rights that could amount to an exception to the at-will doctrine.
C. The employer can terminate Justin only if the employer would suffer a loss by not terminating him.
D. As an at will employee, there are no restrictions on the employer terminating Justin.
E. Because there is no written employment contract, the employer can terminate Justin.
A. The employer would not be able to fire Justin on the basis of public policy.
B. The statements by the manager could likely give Justin contract rights that could amount to an exception to the at-will doctrine.
C. The employer can terminate Justin only if the employer would suffer a loss by not terminating him.
D. As an at will employee, there are no restrictions on the employer terminating Justin.
E. Because there is no written employment contract, the employer can terminate Justin.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.